Ancient Sea-Worm Mystery Solved by Student After 50 Years in “Wastebasket”



This brand-new fossil sampling of the worm Utahscolex ratcliffei aided University of Kansas college student Anna Whitaker resolve a 50- year-old marine-worm mystery. This sampling protects the everted mouthparts (top left). The body of the worm is covered of rows of small round plates, which were made use of to redescribe the varieties. Credit: Whitaker, et. al.

When a partial fossil sampling of a primitive aquatic worm was discovered in Utah in 1969, researchers had a challenging go determining it. Usually, such worms are acknowledged as well as classified by the setup of little handles on their plates. But in this situation, the worm’s plates were unusually smooth, as well as essential littles the worm were missing out on completely.

Discouraged, scientists positioned the mystery worm in a “wastebasket” category called Palaeoscolex, as well as passion in the lowly animal subsided for the following 50 years.

That all altered lately when Paul Jamison, an educator from Logan, Utah, as well as personal collection agency, as well as his student Riley Smith were searching fossils in the Spence Shale in Utah, a 506- million-year-old geologic device real estate a wide variety of incredibly managed soft-bodied as well as biomineralized fossils. (Paleontologists phone call such a mom lode of fossils a “Lagerstätte.”) There, Smith found a 2nd, better managed instance of the worm.

Eventually, many thanks to Jamison’s contribution, the brand-new fossil sampling reached the University of Kansas Biodiversity Institute, where Anna Whitaker, a college student in gallery researches, looked into as well as evaluated the worm with scanning electron microscopic lens, energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry as well as optical microscopy.

At last, Whitaker figured out the worm stood for a brand-new category of Cambrian sea worm heretofore unidentified to scientific research. She’s the lead writer of a summary of the worm simply released in the peer-reviewed paleontological journal PalZ.

“Before the new species that we acquired there was only one specimen known from the Spence Shale,” she stated. “But with our new specimen we discovered it had characteristics that the original specimen didn’t have. So, we were able to update that description, and based on these new characteristics — we decided it didn’t fit in its old genus. So, we moved it to a new one.”

Whitaker as well as her coworkers– Jamison, James Schiffbauer of the University of Missouri as well as Julien Kimmig of KU’s Biodiversity Institute– called the brand-new category Utahscolex.

“We think they’re closely related to priapulid worms that exist today — you can find them in the oceans, and they are very similar to priapulids based on their mouth parts,” Whitaker stated. “What’s characteristic about these guys is that they have a proboscis that can evert, so it can turn itself inside out and it’s covered with spines — that’s how it grabs food and sucks it in. So, it behaved very similarly to modern priapulid worms.”

While today, Utah is not a location you would certainly try to find aquatic life, the situation was various 506 million years back, when animals maintained in the Spence Shale were fossilized.

“The Spence Shale was a shelf system, and it’s really interesting because it preserves a lot of environments — nearshore to even deeper offshore, which is kind of unusual for a Lagerstätte, and especially during the Cambrian. These animals were living in kind of a muddy substrate. This worm was a carnivore, so it was preying on other critters. But there would have been whole diversity of animals — sponges, and trilobites scuttling along. We have very large, for the time, bivalve arthropods that would be predators. The Spence has a very large diversity of arthropods. It would have looked completely alien to us today.”

Whitaker wishes to finish her master’s level this springtime, after that to participate in the University of Toronto to gain her doctorate. The summary of Utahscolex is Whitaker’s very first scholastic magazine, however she wishes it will not be her last. She stated the chance to do such research study is a primary factor for going to KU.

“I came for the museum studies program,” she stated. “It’s one of the best in the country, and the program’s flexibility has allowed me to focus on natural history collections, which is what I hopefully will have a career in, and also gain work experience in the collections and do research — so it’s kind of everything I was looking for in the program.”

While ancient sea worms can strike lots of as a meaninglessly unknown topic for such extreme passion as well as research study, Whitaker stated dental filling in spaces in the fossil document results in a more comprehensive understanding of transformative procedures as well as uses much more granular information regarding the tree of life.

“I know some people might say, ‘Why should we care about these?’” she stated. “But the taxonomy of naming all these species is really an old practice that started in the 1700s. It underpins all the science that we do today. Looking at biodiversity through time, we have to know the species diversity; we have to know as correctly as we can how many species there were and how they were related to each other. This supports our understanding of — as we move into bigger and bigger, broader picture — how we can interpret this fossil record correctly, or as best we can.”

Reference: “Re-description of the Spence Shale palaeoscolecids in light of new morphological features with comments on palaeoscolecid taxonomy and taphonomy” by Anna F. Whitaker, Paul G. Jamison, James D. Schiffbauer as well as Julien Kimmig, 26 February 2020, PalZ.DOI: 10.1007/ s12542-020-00516 -9


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here